Week 1 Reading Response

Overall, the four articles seemed very similar to me. They all detailed the plan, research and problems associated with the Jerusalem portion of the Smithosian folklore festival. Each highlighted several key points.
The article written by Prof. Horowitz posed several questions. It was very clear that she was concerned with the festival not becoming to Disney-like. But I don't feel like this was ever qualified. Disney has the ability to grab our attention, and create awareness on the broader topic. This, to me at least, appears to be the most important aspect of a potential festival. Ensuring that people understand the goal seems like a more attainable goal than portraying an entire multi-cultural, multi-ethnic city in its entirity without offending those in charge. Maybe sensationalizing isn't always bad, but should be utilized as a tool to create awareness, used in moderation. Attempting to create the exact city itself seems like an idea bordering on Disney. Had the organizers embraced this, it might have been an opportunity to expand the scope of the project and ensure completion and funding.
The interview and article by Suad Amiry seemed to address similar points. Amiry's tone in the interview seemed rather pesimestic about the entire process. It was a bit disappointing to hear someone so involved in the process of peace become almost disenchanted with the process. I do greatly appreciate the respect she has for the diversity of Jerusalem. It is refreshing to see somebody admire the multiplicity of an area such as Jerusalem. It did feel that her analysis was overcomplicated. I know this is not a simple thing to do, but it seems like the team was overthinking it and making the process even more difficult. By defining the scope a bit more, the project would have become more manageable and less improbable.
The language of Hasan-Rokem's article seems rather disjointed. It also got me thinking that the approach of the project was a bit off. Had they decided for focus on one or two particular areas, then the team would be better able to give a complete picture of life in that area. Maybe the National Mall is not the best place to completely describe the entire city of Jerusalem. Changing the scope of the project would have helped it to become more successful.
These articles have definitely peaked my interest in the project. All those involved seem to be very intelligent, insightful and idealistic. These are all characteristics which I believe can change the world. Hopefully, given the correct circumstances, they will be able to.